The NaPro Technology Revolution video
NaPro TECHNOLOGY (Natural Procreative Technology) is a major breakthrough in monitoring and maintaining a woman's reproductive and gynecological health. Thirty years of scientific research in the study of the normal and abnormal states of the menstrual and fertility cycles have unraveled their mysteries. When these systems function abnormally, NaProTECHNOLOGY identifies the problems and cooperates with the menstrual and fertility cycles that correct the condition, maintain the human ecology, and sustain the procreative potential.
Jane Doe of Roe vs Wade Never Had an Abortion
There is a 48-year-old woman, born in Texas, who should be dead right now. In fact, she should have never been born. Forty-three years ago, the Supreme Court decided that the Texas law that prevented Jane Roe from ending the life of her unborn daughter was unconstitutional. But by the time the Supreme Court issued its decision in 1973, she had already been born and adopted by a family—likely not knowing that all that ink spilled in Roe v. Wade was about her.
Norma McCorvey was “Jane Roe.” She claimed then that her pregnancy was the result of a rape, although she became outspokenly pro-life and publicly admitted that this, and virtually every fact on which her case was built, was a lie. Both McCorvey and Sandra Cano, the Doe of Doe v. Bolton--Roe’s companion case from Georgia decided the same day—became outspoken pro-life advocates who swore that their cases were built on lies.
But before the Supreme Court could decide whether McCorvey did have a constitutional right to end her unborn daughter’s life, it had to overcome a procedural obstacle that slowed down the process—a delay that factored into whether her daughter would ever have a family.
Because of that delay, McCorvey had already had the child by the time the Supreme Court issued its decision in January 1973. She had been adopted into a Texas home, perhaps somewhere in the Dallas area where McCorvey lived. The court nevertheless said that McCorvey’s case was not moot since her circumstances were “capable of repetition” because courts would never be able to decide the question during the time of a woman’s pregnancy.
Procedural history is never the exciting part of a lawsuit. But for McCorvey’s unborn daughter, the dry complexity of legal procedure is the reason she exists today. Fortunately for a three-year old girl, “the wheels of justice grind slowly,” and by the time the court issued its decision, a Texas family had adopted her. If the courts could have moved more quickly, she (and her family) would have never had that chance.
It is unknown to me whether the adoptive family ever even knew that their daughter was the supposedly unwanted child who was the subject of Roe. As far as we know, they raised her not knowing who she was and certainly never telling her. LifeNews
This week many are talking about the more than 60 million people whose lives have been brutally ended by abortion. And rightly so. The numbers are staggering. Imagine the average attendance at every NFL, NBA, and NHL game – gone. Eliminated. The population of the 18 states in the area from Arkansas and Wisconsin in the East to Idaho and Nevada in the west: gone. More than either the Hispanic or the African American population of the U.S.
It’s horrific. But it’s also personal. And today somewhere, maybe still in Texas, there lives a 48-year-old woman, perhaps with a family and a career of her own, with beautiful children that she loves dearly. Perhaps with a husband and family that can’t imagine life without her. The 58 million other babies deserved that same chance at life. Like McCorvey’s daughter, they were all created in the image of a loving God and would have been loved and wanted by someone. That’s why we fight. That’s #WhyWeMarch.
There is a 48-year-old woman, born in Texas, who should be dead right now. In fact, she should have never been born. Forty-three years ago, the Supreme Court decided that the Texas law that prevented Jane Roe from ending the life of her unborn daughter was unconstitutional. But by the time the Supreme Court issued its decision in 1973, she had already been born and adopted by a family—likely not knowing that all that ink spilled in Roe v. Wade was about her.
Norma McCorvey was “Jane Roe.” She claimed then that her pregnancy was the result of a rape, although she became outspokenly pro-life and publicly admitted that this, and virtually every fact on which her case was built, was a lie. Both McCorvey and Sandra Cano, the Doe of Doe v. Bolton--Roe’s companion case from Georgia decided the same day—became outspoken pro-life advocates who swore that their cases were built on lies.
But before the Supreme Court could decide whether McCorvey did have a constitutional right to end her unborn daughter’s life, it had to overcome a procedural obstacle that slowed down the process—a delay that factored into whether her daughter would ever have a family.
Because of that delay, McCorvey had already had the child by the time the Supreme Court issued its decision in January 1973. She had been adopted into a Texas home, perhaps somewhere in the Dallas area where McCorvey lived. The court nevertheless said that McCorvey’s case was not moot since her circumstances were “capable of repetition” because courts would never be able to decide the question during the time of a woman’s pregnancy.
Procedural history is never the exciting part of a lawsuit. But for McCorvey’s unborn daughter, the dry complexity of legal procedure is the reason she exists today. Fortunately for a three-year old girl, “the wheels of justice grind slowly,” and by the time the court issued its decision, a Texas family had adopted her. If the courts could have moved more quickly, she (and her family) would have never had that chance.
It is unknown to me whether the adoptive family ever even knew that their daughter was the supposedly unwanted child who was the subject of Roe. As far as we know, they raised her not knowing who she was and certainly never telling her. LifeNews
This week many are talking about the more than 60 million people whose lives have been brutally ended by abortion. And rightly so. The numbers are staggering. Imagine the average attendance at every NFL, NBA, and NHL game – gone. Eliminated. The population of the 18 states in the area from Arkansas and Wisconsin in the East to Idaho and Nevada in the west: gone. More than either the Hispanic or the African American population of the U.S.
It’s horrific. But it’s also personal. And today somewhere, maybe still in Texas, there lives a 48-year-old woman, perhaps with a family and a career of her own, with beautiful children that she loves dearly. Perhaps with a husband and family that can’t imagine life without her. The 58 million other babies deserved that same chance at life. Like McCorvey’s daughter, they were all created in the image of a loving God and would have been loved and wanted by someone. That’s why we fight. That’s #WhyWeMarch.
|
"BLACK LIVES MATTER" - So What About the Millions of Black Babies Killed in Abortion? We have experienced many advances made possible from contributions from members of the African American Community. . . . Yet, here in the 21st century, we are faced with an epidemic that threatens the Black community, and indeed the entire fabric of our nation in a manner that has never before occurred in our history. In America since 1973, over 58 million people, nearly 36% of these numbers being identified as African American people, have been denied the right to be born. Their innocent lives were ended as they were attacked in the sanctuaries of their mothers’ wombs – by the heinous scourge of abortion. Read more Alveda King niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr |
|
You Can Reverse the Abortion Pill Have you taken the first dose of mifepristone (also known as RU486 or the “abortion pill”)? Do you regret your decision and wish you could reverse the effects of the abortion pill? There is a process for reversing the abortion pill, but time is essential! Call us right away, so we can talk with you and find you help. http://www.abortionpillreversal.com/ (877) 558-0333 |
|
|
How: "The Pill" Works as an Abortifacient This brief three minute YouTube video is an animation showing how the contraceptive pill sometimes causes an abortion http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiCU46_lWeE |
Cleveland Clinic IVF Goes High-Tech - Now Able to See Every Moment of an Embry's Development
The Cleveland Clinic has something new in the world of reproductive science. It's an Embryoscope. It is a high-tech incubator and time-lapse camera that captures the beginning of life. "Imagine you're able to see every minute of the embryo's development, even before it's transferred to the uterus, before it implants on the uterine wall you're able to see this embryo. It's never been possible before," says Dr. Nina Desaiof the IVF Clinic. Traditionally, Dr. Desai takes an embryo out of the standard incubator once a day to look at it under a microscope. But a lot can happen, when she's not looking, that she'd miss. The Embryoscope keeps the embryos in a "safe" and stable environment and tracks every second of their development. That gives doctors an even better chance to catch subtle changes. {Catching these "changes" allows the doctor to choose the embryos deemed unsuitable and destroy them.} "We're learning so much that we hadn't realized happens to an embryo as it grows so we are just blown away by this. It's an amazing, amazing technology." says Dr. Desai. read more about the Embryoscope |
If you truly care about women and breast cancer . . .
Please take time to watch this full
Episode 11 of "Facing Life Head-On"
regarding Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
Then, be sure to read the "10.23.11" edition
of "It's a Matter of Life" on this site.
The Pill’s Legacy: Sickness, Cancer, Blood Clots, Death
"The pill is packaged and sold as a panacea for the world’s problems and as a ticket to freedom for women. In reality, the birth control pill and other contraceptives are making women sick, disabling them, and even killing them.
In 2005, the World Health Organization listed the pill (estrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives) as a Group 1 cancer-causing agent that raises risk for breast, liver, and cervical cancers.
Lawsuits against contraceptive manufacturers continue to mount, and millions of dollars are being awarded to victims—mostly because of blood clots that cause strokes, heart attacks, and death.
New research and headlines continue to confirm that the pill kills. Young women schooled in the idea that contraception should be used to prevent pregnancy at all cost learn to think of babies as the enemy that will destroy their lives, then default to abortion when they find they are pregnant.
That fear of children that results from the contraceptive mentality, coupled with the abortifacient nature of the pill, is depopulating and destroying our society one child at a time." Pill
Could Your Birth Control Kill or Disable You?
The Pill Kills Women
The Pill Kills Babies
"The pill is packaged and sold as a panacea for the world’s problems and as a ticket to freedom for women. In reality, the birth control pill and other contraceptives are making women sick, disabling them, and even killing them.
In 2005, the World Health Organization listed the pill (estrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives) as a Group 1 cancer-causing agent that raises risk for breast, liver, and cervical cancers.
Lawsuits against contraceptive manufacturers continue to mount, and millions of dollars are being awarded to victims—mostly because of blood clots that cause strokes, heart attacks, and death.
New research and headlines continue to confirm that the pill kills. Young women schooled in the idea that contraception should be used to prevent pregnancy at all cost learn to think of babies as the enemy that will destroy their lives, then default to abortion when they find they are pregnant.
That fear of children that results from the contraceptive mentality, coupled with the abortifacient nature of the pill, is depopulating and destroying our society one child at a time." Pill
Could Your Birth Control Kill or Disable You?
The Pill Kills Women
The Pill Kills Babies
Women with a Predisposition to Crohn's Disease Who Take Birth Control Pills Are 300% More Likely to Develop the Disease: According to Study
A new US study has found that a huge increase in Crohn’s disease cases in women in the past fifty years corresponds to the introduction and widespread use of oral contraceptive pills since the 1960s.
Crohn’s disease is an incurable ailment affecting the digestive system characterized by abdominal pain, severe diarrhea, fever, fatigue, weight loss and malnutrition.
Harvard gastroenterologist Dr Hamed Khalili's study of 230,000 American women found that those who had used the pill for five years or more had a 300 percent higher risk of developing Crohn’s disease than those who had never used it.
Dr Khalili explained that while oral contraceptive drugs do not directly cause Crohn’s disease, the synthetic hormones have side effects that contribute to the higher risk he identified.
. . . . He said that genetic screening could dissuade women who have a genetic predisposition to Crohn’s from using the drugs. Crohn's
A new US study has found that a huge increase in Crohn’s disease cases in women in the past fifty years corresponds to the introduction and widespread use of oral contraceptive pills since the 1960s.
Crohn’s disease is an incurable ailment affecting the digestive system characterized by abdominal pain, severe diarrhea, fever, fatigue, weight loss and malnutrition.
Harvard gastroenterologist Dr Hamed Khalili's study of 230,000 American women found that those who had used the pill for five years or more had a 300 percent higher risk of developing Crohn’s disease than those who had never used it.
Dr Khalili explained that while oral contraceptive drugs do not directly cause Crohn’s disease, the synthetic hormones have side effects that contribute to the higher risk he identified.
. . . . He said that genetic screening could dissuade women who have a genetic predisposition to Crohn’s from using the drugs. Crohn's
|
You can't tell can you? They look the same don't they? Why should one be killed and the other allowed to live? It doesn't make sense does it? All life is precious! |
Every 94 Seconds, Planned Parenthood Cures a Woman of the "Terrible Disease" of Pregnancy!
"I’m so excited, you guys. Excited and inspired. You see, I just found out that in 2011, Planned Parenthood cured 333,000 women of a dangerous and terrible disease. I am speaking, of course, of pregnancy.
With only a meager $542.4 million in taxpayer money, the courageous and selfless public servants of Planned Parenthood were able to cure one woman every 94 seconds. That’s right: in 2011, every 94 seconds, a woman was delivered from the grisly fate of pregnancy and childbirth."
"I’m so excited, you guys. Excited and inspired. You see, I just found out that in 2011, Planned Parenthood cured 333,000 women of a dangerous and terrible disease. I am speaking, of course, of pregnancy.
With only a meager $542.4 million in taxpayer money, the courageous and selfless public servants of Planned Parenthood were able to cure one woman every 94 seconds. That’s right: in 2011, every 94 seconds, a woman was delivered from the grisly fate of pregnancy and childbirth."
National Cancer Institute Researcher Admits Abortion Breast Cancer Link
U.S. National Cancer Institute researcher Dr. Louise Brinton, who was the chief organizer of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) workshop in 2003 that persuaded women that it was "well established" that "abortion is not associated with increased breast cancer risk," has reversed her position and now admits that abortion and oral contraceptives raise breast cancer risks.
An April 2009 study by Jessica Dolle et al. of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center examining the relationship between oral contraceptives (OCs) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with high mortality, in women under age 45, contained an admission from Dr. Brinton and her colleagues that abortion raises breast cancer risk by 40%.
The study found that "a statistically significant 40% increased risk for women who have abortions" exists, and that a " 270% increased risk of triple negative breast cancer (an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with high mortality) among those who used oral contraceptives while under age 18 and a 320% increased risk of triple negative breast cancer among recent users (within 1-5 years) of oral contraceptives," also exists. Read complete story about the Abortion-Breast Cancer link.
U.S. National Cancer Institute researcher Dr. Louise Brinton, who was the chief organizer of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) workshop in 2003 that persuaded women that it was "well established" that "abortion is not associated with increased breast cancer risk," has reversed her position and now admits that abortion and oral contraceptives raise breast cancer risks.
An April 2009 study by Jessica Dolle et al. of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center examining the relationship between oral contraceptives (OCs) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with high mortality, in women under age 45, contained an admission from Dr. Brinton and her colleagues that abortion raises breast cancer risk by 40%.
The study found that "a statistically significant 40% increased risk for women who have abortions" exists, and that a " 270% increased risk of triple negative breast cancer (an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with high mortality) among those who used oral contraceptives while under age 18 and a 320% increased risk of triple negative breast cancer among recent users (within 1-5 years) of oral contraceptives," also exists. Read complete story about the Abortion-Breast Cancer link.
Artificially Produced Stem Cells 'Hold On' to Genetic Past
Are the new stem cell technologies too good to be true? New research suggests this may be the case.
Researchers at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California say they have found that induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells may retain the genetic memory of their previous life, which could restrict the possible uses of such cells in therapy.
The study, published in this week’s online edition of the journal Nature, found significant differences between the reprogrammed iPS cells and true pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Read more about these stem cells.
Are the new stem cell technologies too good to be true? New research suggests this may be the case.
Researchers at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California say they have found that induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells may retain the genetic memory of their previous life, which could restrict the possible uses of such cells in therapy.
The study, published in this week’s online edition of the journal Nature, found significant differences between the reprogrammed iPS cells and true pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Read more about these stem cells.
Abortion Pills Found More Dangerous Than Surgical Procedures
Chemical abortions using the drug RU-486 are more dangerous to mothers than surgical abortions, an Australian study has found.
Researchers who examined almost 7,000 cases found that 3.3% of the women who used the "abortion pill" for first-trimester abortions had complications sufficient to put them in hospital emergency rooms. The comparable figure for surgical abortions was 2.2%. The differences were even more pronounced among women whose post-abortion complications required a hospital stay. Read complete article
Chemical abortions using the drug RU-486 are more dangerous to mothers than surgical abortions, an Australian study has found.
Researchers who examined almost 7,000 cases found that 3.3% of the women who used the "abortion pill" for first-trimester abortions had complications sufficient to put them in hospital emergency rooms. The comparable figure for surgical abortions was 2.2%. The differences were even more pronounced among women whose post-abortion complications required a hospital stay. Read complete article
"Hello Baby" Pregnancy Calendar
You've heard a lot about the ways your baby will develop during your pregnancy - now Pampers enables you to experience baby development like never before: at simulated life-size, right on your iPad. Enter your due date to track week-by-week typical progress and learn about the important changes happening.
Hold the iPad in front of your tummy and see a typical representation of the baby, with richly detailed images illustrating his or her growth. Hello Baby is a whole new way to get your family excited to welcome its newest member.
You've heard a lot about the ways your baby will develop during your pregnancy - now Pampers enables you to experience baby development like never before: at simulated life-size, right on your iPad. Enter your due date to track week-by-week typical progress and learn about the important changes happening.
Hold the iPad in front of your tummy and see a typical representation of the baby, with richly detailed images illustrating his or her growth. Hello Baby is a whole new way to get your family excited to welcome its newest member.
Things you can do:
1. See how a baby grows during your pregnancy. View close-ups of little hands and feet, and listen to what a heartbeat might sound like.
2. Add personalized details including your child’s due date, name, size, and weight.
3. Take the iPad wherever you go to share the exciting developments with friends and family. Open iTunes to buy and download apps.
1. See how a baby grows during your pregnancy. View close-ups of little hands and feet, and listen to what a heartbeat might sound like.
2. Add personalized details including your child’s due date, name, size, and weight.
3. Take the iPad wherever you go to share the exciting developments with friends and family. Open iTunes to buy and download apps.